Kubuntu 9.04 was released April 23rd, 2008, and with it brought a newly improved desktop (KDE 4.2), as well as the speed improvements that Ubuntu also gained. Unfortunately, while the new release of Ubuntu last week was completely amazing, the new Kubuntu has a few problems and an almost completely broken network manager that keep it from perfection, yet its speed and stability may still impress.
For those that aren’t already aware, Kubuntu is a member of the Ubuntu family, which also includes derivatives such as Edubuntu and Xubuntu. While Ubuntu uses the GNOME desktop by default, Kubuntu uses the KDE desktop, as well as it’s own set of productivity tools. With Kubuntu, you get Konqueror for web browsing, Kopete for chatting across instant messaging networks (AIM, Yahoo, ICQ, and the like) and OpenOffice for working with word processing and spreadsheets. There is also an application for chatting on IRC networks (Quassel) downloading torrent files (KTorrent) and browsing directories (Dolphin). The default Kubuntu install quite possibly contains everything you need right out of the box.
The installation routine for Kubuntu is largely unchanged from previous releases. That’s a good thing, since the installer it uses has served us very well and gets the job done nicely. Installing Kubuntu is simple. Burn the CD, boot from it, click “install”, answer the questions, reboot, and you’re done. The only big difference I noticed with the installation is the nicer looking location screen. Other than that, this is still the simple and friendly installer we’ve all come to love.
Just like Ubuntu, Kubuntu includes support for the newly stabilized EXT4 file system, which offers a decent speed increase for reading and writing to the drive, among other improvements. The default file system is still EXT3, however you now have the option to choose EXT4 as your file system during installation. Unfortunately, during Kubuntu’s beta process I have read many reports regarding data loss with the new file system. Thankfully, those issues should be rectified with the patches that were included before the final release, at least for the most part. However, even though there have been complaints, I have been using EXT4 on four computers for several months, and I haven’t had a single problem moving several hundred gigabytes of data between them. Regardless, until EXT4 has had more time to harden itself, the risk is yours, so proceed with caution.
Unfortunately, you won’t find that many new features here. Instead, it appears that the focus was to make everything run faster and more stable, even though no one from Canonical has officially confirmed that, as far as I know. Focusing on speed and stability certainly isn’t a bad thing, and is actually very welcome. That is not to say that there are no new features in this release, however. Rather, almost all of the new features included were those that were automatically inherited due to the inclusion of KDE 4.2, which in itself, includes a ton of improvements. In fact, if you’re a KDE4 user, KDE 4.2 is something of a “required” upgrade, and further bridges the gap between the KDE3 days of old, and the KDE4 days of today and beyond. In my opinion, KDE 4.2 is the best desktop software ever created for Linux, but don’t take my word for it, try it for yourself and see if it fits your needs.
Some other improvements you can expect to find in this release are the inclusion of QT4.5 (which eliminates the system tray bug from previous releases) Amarok 2.02 (which many people hate, but I adore) and a new network manager (which I found to be the biggest letdown of this release). Another improvement is the inclusion of Kpackagekit, which is a very nice software manager. (And likely one of the best ones I’ve ever used).
Unfortunately, while what I wrote so far sounds really good, this release is not perfect. One let-down (though a more minor one) is the lack of any real polish, as there are no custom themes in this release whatsoever. Everything is vanilla KDE, looking exactly the same as if you compiled everything yourself from source. The Kubuntu team used to include some very beautiful custom artwork in each release, but what happened? Ever since KDE4 came into the picture, these custom themes have completely disappeared. Granted, the default theme is usually the first thing people change; However first impressions matter quite a bit, and the first impression generated here is that Canonical just doesn’t care to go the extra mile with Kubuntu anymore. Ubuntu got new community themes, a new wallpaper, AND a new GDM theme. Xubuntu received some visual attention as well. Why couldn’t Kubuntu get some love too?
It gets worse. Kubuntu 9.04 received a new network manager plasmoid that is added to your panel by default, which replaces knetworkmanager of past releases. The problem is, this new utility won’t connect to pretty much any wireless network. I have tried several routers, and several computers, and the new network manager just doesn’t work. In fact, on the laptop that I’m typing this article on right now, I can’t connect to my wireless router under Kubuntu; Yet Ubuntu has no problem with it, on the same system! Many have complained about knetworkmanager, however I would gladly take that over this new one any day. The new network manager is quite possibly the worst piece of technology I’ve ever seen in a Linux distribution in the decade I’ve been a Linux user! I’m sure after it’s tested further it will improve and become awesome, but for now, the Kubuntu developers should be ashamed of themselves for even including it. You may get lucky and have it work for you, but you probably won’t. Luckily there is a replacement called “wicd” in the repositories that you can install, which seems to do a much better job.
The worst part of the network manager ordeal is that the developers were aware of it’s inability to function. In the official release notes, underneath “known issues” I quote: “Network Manager does not connect to some networks”. And another: “Connection to non-broadcasting (hidden SSID) wireless networks with the network-manager widget isn’t possible”. You can view the bug reports regarding this issue here and here. I would understand if this was an old issue that developers were still looking to resolve, however these types of networks worked just fine in Kubuntu 8.10, so there is absolutely no excuse for Canonical to have released Kubuntu 9.04 with such a huge bug.
To be fair, not everyone uses wireless networks, so those issues won’t affect everyone. Those of you that upgrade to Kubuntu 9.04 will appreciate the speed and stability improvements, as well as the features acquired with KDE 4.2. However, if you use any wireless networks at all, you should skip out on this release altogether until the issues are fixed. If you still insist, you should still test your network with the Live CD first.
Compared to Ubuntu 9.04, the new release of Kubuntu just can’t compare in almost any regard except for the areas that were influenced by Ubuntu itself. There was no polish put into the release, and problems with wireless networking exist that are exclusive to this release. Remember folks – I am a Kubuntu user, I have been for years, and I prefer the KDE4 desktop, so my disappointment with this release is saying a lot.
Report Card
Installation (5/5)
- The same tried and true approach to installation that we’re all used to, and it still works well.New Features (2/5)
- The only new features here are what was inherited from Ubuntu (the EXT4 file system, for example) and the new features that KDE 4.2 brought to the table. Little to no Kubuntu-specific modifications exist here.Look & Feel (1/5)
- Canonical completely dropped the ball here. There were little to no improvements made to the look and feel, beyond what KDE 4.2 includes by default. KDE 4.2 itself looks great, but Kubuntu didn’t contribute to that at all.Stability (5/5)
- This is by far one of the most stable Kubuntu releases yet.Connectivity (1/5)
- The included network manager is horrible and has problems connecting to both WEP and WPA2, and probably other encryption types.Speed (5/5)
- Kubuntu 9.04 is one of the speediest releases yet, although desktop effects can still take a toll, as always.Overall: 3/5 (Average)
Kubuntu 9.04 is a very mixed release. On one hand, it’s extremely stable and extremely fast. On the other hand, there was little to no polish put into it, and the included network manager is far from user friendly or even usable.The good:
EXT4 support
KDE 4.2
Very fast and stableThe bad:
No polish at all
Problems with wireless connections
Worst Network Manager in distribution history

Stable? Hardly. Kubuntu 9.04 has crashed hard on me several times since installation. I’m very disappointed, I was ready to convert to Kubuntu from OpenSuse, but not if it’s like this.
The network manager plasmoid works but there is a trick to it. You need to have kdewalletmanager installed and then when you set up your wireless connection and it asks you to create a kdewallet password leave it blank so you don’t need to enter a password just to log into the internet. the network manager is where you set up your wpa/wpa2 password info anyway. Once you do this your shiny new kubuntu system will log into the internet when you log in or reboot.
@rsmrcina:
What kind of crash scenarios did you experience exactly?
@bjb1959:
I have tried what you mentioned, and I’m still unable to connect to my wireless network, unfortunately. It will connect if I try around 25 times, however. (I’m not exaggerating). Regardless, the Kubuntu developers shouldn’t have released the OS with a faulty network manager.
Thank you for your comments!!!
You may want to try the Mandriva 2009 Spring which will be released in a few days.
It have a very good custom KDE implementation, and good wireless support with even regulatory domain support ! 100% legal
http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/2009.1_Tour
http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/2009.1_Notes
http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/2009.1_Reviewers_Guide
I’ve been using Kubuntu Intrepid in 3 computers (work, home and laptop) and had no problems with the network manager plasmoid so far. I’ve connected to my wireless router using WPA flawlessly.
It does have a minor issue: when clicking on it, it doesn’t allocate enough room to display all wireless connections. See this bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-widget-network-manager/+bug/336190
I am so glad to see someone taking notice at lack of attention that Kubuntu gets. I hope that your blog will be much read and receive a lot of attention.
I believe that you have missed an important bug and that is that there is an serious performance regression on intel graphic cards. All my friends have sufferd from this. And it is a known issue. I know what some may say it is not canonical developers to blame, but why did they put new drivers, everything worked fine on 8.10, and now even with old drivers there are still problems. This is not only my opinion read more here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReinhardTartler/X/RevertingIntelDriverTo2.4
@MirzaD:
Thank you for your comments. My laptop has an intel video card, and everything is working fine here. While I’m sure you are referring to a definite bug, I can only report on the things I experience first hand.
You complain about lack of new features over KDE 4.2. That KDE 4 includes printer setup and administration is entirely down to Kubuntu. We prefer to work upstream where possible so we include out work in KDE itself.
You also complain about the lack of artwork over KDE. We really love the KDE 4 artwork which is world class, and see no reason to change it. Kubuntu hopes to bring out the best from KDE, we don’t change parts where KDE is already the best.
The network management is an ugly problem. As you’ve noticed in your follow up article we are working on an update. If you are having network problems install the update from the kubuntu-experimental PPA and comment on the bug, thanks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-widget-network-manager/+bug/339313/comments/32
@JRiddell:
Thank you for taking the time to check out my review and comment.
I agree that KDE4 looks nice as it is, however I still believe that polish is needed for Kubuntu in terms of its artwork. It shows that the developers care to go the extra mile. The general consensus is that Kubuntu doesn’t get the attention that Ubuntu and Xubuntu gets, and this latest release shows that statement is correct. Ubuntu, Xubuntu, and Kubuntu are each members of the same family, and each need the same respect. If one derivative gets a new feature, so should the other two. If one member of the family gets a new default theme, then they all should. Having the same default theme in Kubuntu as KDE4 itself makes it look the same as any other release containing KDE4.
Now, I want you to keep in mind that I’m a huge Kubuntu fan, and I have been since the distribution debuted. I also have extremely high expectations for Kubuntu as well, but then again I have high expectations of all releases. I can understand and respect your standpoint as a developer, however you also need to understand the viewpoints of your users. Appearances are everything, and if it appears that the product doesn’t get the attention it deserves (which may or may not be the case) it makes the user feel that their product isn’t appreciated. Look around at the comments all over the net regarding Kubuntu (as I’m sure you do) and you’ll find that quite a few people agree with me on this one.
Kubuntu is a wonderful distribution and is my default and will probably remain so, but releasing another release with no attention paid to polish whatsoever and coupling that with shipping a broken network manager on release day, shows that this release of Kubuntu nowhere near the expectations of virtually anyone. As a huge Kubuntu fan myself, I look forward to the opportunity to review Kubuntu 9.10 and give it the 5/5 it deserves, and it’s up to developers such as yourself to make that happen. Add new features, polish it, and make sure everything works. That’s all I could ever ask. I’m sure you can understand the viewpoint of the end user, if you looked at this release through their eyes.
your review was spot on. i was so very upset with the wireless problem that i took kubuntu out, and put in xubuntu (i have never really liked ubuntu, but that is my problem, not ubuntu’s). xubuntu is ok, and had really got it working nicely… but i tried a screen saver, and it froze. can’t unfreeze it. running out of time. will (probably) install kubuntu again (space problems), or go back to pclos 2009. at least we have choice. shame about kubuntu. will look out for the update. really enjoyed your article, balanced and all that. actually, not all that. really balanced. especially about the makeover. looking forward to 9.10 like you too.